Gender Equality by 2030: Possibility or Utopia?

Haeley Ahn and Pamela Chrabieh
Dubai, 2016

This year’s March 8 International Women’s Day United Nations theme is “Planet 50-50 by 2030: Step It Up for Gender Equality”. With the new global 2030 roadmap and 17 Sustainable Development Goals approved by UN Member States, gender equality appears to be the most critical[1]. According to Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka, UN Under-Secretary-General and Executive Director (UN Women):

“Without gender equality and a full role for women in society, in the economy, in governance, we will not be able to achieve the world we hoped for”.[2]

Numerous governments have signed their support for such a change by amending legislation to eliminate discrimination against women, improving enrollment of girls in primary and secondary education, reducing maternal deaths… However, to that date, the support has not been felt all the way through society – often, diverse social layers are not responsive or energized in the way the government wants them to be – , the gap between those who draw up the commitments and those who are supposed to carry them out has been widened, gender ministries have tended to be underfunded and lacked the influence and weight of larger and stronger ministries, and advances have been low in other vital areas such as increasing women’s access to decent work, higher positions or equal pay.

To that date, no country has achieved 100% gender equality. So much more is needed to learn lessons from the past – with both its worldviews/spaces of gender equality and of inequality, such as the past of Southwestern Asia and North Africa – and change the trajectory of gender equality and the empowerment of women. First, the question as to whether there ought to be a spontaneous involvement from all individuals and groups within a society, or whether the government must induce the change, needs to be answered for change initiatives to succeed. The same question is asked when it comes to diversity management in any institution, the academic for instance.

As I see it, the engagement of governments is important but certainly not enough; any top down change initiative needs to be communicated appropriately through official and non-official channels such as education (in schools and universities), knowledge production and dissemination (research centers, independent scholars), media campaigns and continuous awareness programs (traditional media, social media). We certainly need awareness in our schools and universities when it comes to feminism and gender equality! My researches in Lebanon when I used to teach in three different universities from 2007 to 201 indicated the prevailing existence of confusion and misconceptions at this level: gender equality for instance was perceived by many young women and men as simply, ‘the end of men, tradition or identity’, and feminism as misandry – meaning feminists are ‘men-haters’. The preliminary results of a small-scale research conducted by my assistant researcher Ms. Haeley Ahn in her school revealed the existence of a wide spectrum of opinions when students were asked the following questions but with a relatively high percentage of misconceptions: Did you know that March 8th is the International Women’s Day? How do you feel about women’s rights in the region (Middle East)? How do you think women’s rights could be improved in this region? What is your perspective on feminism? Would you consider yourself a feminist? Do you think your perspective aligns with how society views feminism? [Excerpts of results are found here: Analysis]

According to Ms. Ahn:

“I realized that the biggest responsibility we feminists have is to redefine feminism in today’s society and eliminate any stigmas or stereotypes associated with it. The lack of understanding of what feminism truly is causes irrational fear and even hostility towards the movement. On a brighter note, those who did not identify themselves as feminists still mentioned that they advocate for gender equality. Once misunderstandings are cleared and people realize that feminism is in fact a call for equality, the feminist movement will surely gain an influx of supporters and a new momentum!”

The UN Millennium Development Goals define ‘gender equality’ as not only a fundamental human right but a necessary foundation for a peaceful, prosperous and sustainable world.

“Providing women and girls with equal access to education, health care, decent work, and representation in political and economic decision-making processes will fuel sustainable economies and benefit societies and humanity at large”.[3]

Gender equality does not mean that women and men will become the same, but that women’s and men’s rights, responsibilities and opportunities will not depend on whether they are born male or female. Gender equality implies that the interests, needs and priorities of both women and men (and other gender identities) are taken into consideration. And in fact, the Southwestern Asian and North African regions’ past and present include considerable examples of gender equality perceptions and practices: from ancient Egyptians to Zoroastrians and a number of tribes in the Arabian Peninsula, to the 19th c. feminist movements from Tunisia to Iraq, and contemporary voices/initiatives… Gender equality is not an imported concept-product. It lies at the heart of the local cultures and legacies. It is found in countless homes and minds. It just needs to be rediscovered and portrayed as such, encouraged where it already exists, and disseminated to every strata of society.

Governments do play a fundamental role in achieving these tasks. However, people who are forced to adapt to change through a top down approach have the initial reaction to resist. Individuals and non-governmental organizations ought to have their voices heard and taken into consideration in the way the change initiatives are managed. Furthermore, visionary ideas aren’t the products of only leaders and top management. Examples of innovations by activists, students, professors, artists, social movements and civil associations, and successful micro-management methods such as in schools and university classrooms, or in small and medium-size enterprises, are proofs of the ‘organic growth’ approach success rather than the ‘transplanted growth’s’ – or of the success of the two approaches’ combinations. The more people will be involved by governments in the change process, the less they will feel they are perceived as somehow incompetent, the less they will be unmotivated, the less misunderstandings will be created, the more people will be able to come to terms with change, and will be able to produce and contribute to their society’s advancement. Definitely, much will depend on our individual and collective, disparate, irregularly connected but certainly continuous initiatives, and on our abilities to articulate and foster coherent new paradigms.

Gender equality by 2030: Possibility or Utopia?

The question should not even be asked. Gender equality is already a possibility, as it constitutes one of the many realities of our pasts and presents. Let us not “dwell in possibility”, but recognize it, and embrace the challenges that lie ahead of us with courage, faith and hope.


This article is the product of a joint venture between Ms. Haeley Ahn and I. I would like to thank her for her amazing and enlightening work. A role model for our young generation of feminists!


About Dr. Pamela Chrabieh

Lebanese-Canadian Doctor of Sciences of Religions (University of Montreal, QC, Canada). Founder of the 'Red Lips High Heels' movement. Founder and Director of SPNC Learning & Communication, University Professor, Artist, Activist and Writer. Dr. Pamela Chrabieh (Badine) has an extensive 20+ year multidisciplinary and international experience and expertise in university teaching, academic research, visual arts, art direction, communication, content creation, project management, training and conference/workshop organization.

, , , ,

35 Responses to Gender Equality by 2030: Possibility or Utopia?

  1. Amida S. March 7, 2016 at 10:10 am #

    Excellent post!
    And happy international women’s day!

  2. Maryam Saliba March 7, 2016 at 10:11 am #

    Happy international women’s day Dr. And Ms. Ahn. Thank you for your enlightening article. A wind of hope :)

  3. Sherine Sabri March 7, 2016 at 10:24 am #

    Dear Dr. Chrabieh, i would like to congratulate you, as well as Ms. Haeley Ahn, and to wish you both a happy international women’s day. From Cairo with love!

  4. Makram H. March 7, 2016 at 10:28 am #

    We are all feminists when we believe in gender equality! Men and women.
    I agree with the possibity of gender equality and the fact that it’s not a ‘strange external’ concept.

  5. Fadi March 7, 2016 at 10:31 am #

    I honestly don’t believe in gender equality. Women and men have different roles to play in society. If women don’t have children and take care of them, how will the human specie survive? How will our societies develop?

    • Dr. Pamela Chrabieh March 7, 2016 at 1:16 pm #

      Hello Fadi,

      The undervaluing of women’s work and the under-utilisation of women’s skills is a lost resource for the economy and for society at large. A better use of women’s skills allows them to better contribute to the economy as a whole. Empowered women contribute to the health and productivity of whole families and communities, and they improve prospects for the next generation. Investing in gender equality and women’s empowerment can unlock human potential on a transformational scale.

  6. Joumana Mel March 7, 2016 at 10:40 am #

    To Dr. Chrabieh and Ms. Ahn: Bravo!

    To Fadi: why would working outside the house be a problem? So many women are able to have children and contribute to society at different levels. And who said the education of children is the sole responsibility of women?
    We cannot expect to advance if half of the worldwide population is subjugated or discriminated.

  7. Lamiss March 7, 2016 at 12:51 pm #

    Is this about post-feminism?

    • Dr. Pamela Chrabieh March 7, 2016 at 12:57 pm #

      Good afternoon Lamiss. It certainly is not about post-feminism. I certainly do not see feminism as no longer relevant to today’s society, and I am not claiming gender equality has been achieved – if one believes ‘achievement’ = 100%
      Gender equality does exist as a discourse, belief and in practice, such as in Southwestern Asia and North Africa (and contrary to what is usually believed). It’s part of the landscape, the mentality, the culture, the memory and history of local populations. However, it needs to be ‘boosted’.

  8. Stephan March 7, 2016 at 1:04 pm #

    I read many articles and reports about gender equality. Many agree on the following: inequalities still exist but there has been significant progress over the last decades: equal treatment legislation in many countries, gender mainstreaming (integration of the gender perspective into all other policies), specific measures for the advancement of women, more women in the labour market and better education and training.
    Gender gaps remain however. Women are still over-represented in lower paid sectors and under-represented in decision-making positions.

  9. Stephan March 7, 2016 at 1:05 pm #

    I also think governments and feminists should work to reduce the gender pay, earnings and pension gaps and thus fight poverty among women.

    • Dr. Pamela Chrabieh March 7, 2016 at 1:10 pm #

      Women have as good or sometimes better qualifications than men, but often their skills are not valued the same as men’s and their career progression is slower.

      This results in an average gender pay gap: example 16 % in the EU.

      As for Southwestern Asia and North Africa, and according to the World Economic Forum, estimations put the pay gap between 20 and 40%

  10. Marilyn March 7, 2016 at 1:21 pm #

    Women account for one-half of the potential human capital in any economy. Countries with greater gender equality are more prosperous and competitive (World Bank). When women participate in civil society and politics, governments are more open, democratic and responsive to citizens.

    • Dr. Pamela Chrabieh March 7, 2016 at 1:22 pm #

      Thank you Marilyn for your input.
      Loving the vibes of this virtual debate!

  11. Houssam March 7, 2016 at 1:23 pm #

    I would say: utopia!
    Specifically in the Middle East.
    What can one expect with ongoing wars???

    • Dr. Pamela Chrabieh March 7, 2016 at 1:24 pm #

      I understand your perspective Houssam, but is the ‘Middle East’ ONE reality? That of war?

  12. Dr. Marrouch March 7, 2016 at 1:30 pm #

    Interesting post!

    Happy International Women’s Day!

  13. Kalima March 7, 2016 at 1:31 pm #

    My question is addressed to Ms. Ahn: can you give us examples of definitions of feminism by students you interviewed?

  14. Kalima March 7, 2016 at 1:32 pm #

    And do you think that many young school students in Dubai and elsewhere think the same?

  15. anonymous March 7, 2016 at 1:36 pm #

    I choose: possibility and utopia. Both…
    It depends on the context.
    In Saudi Arabia where I lived for many years: utopia!!

    • Dr. Pamela Chrabieh March 8, 2016 at 5:16 am #

      Interesting perspective, but even in Saudi Arabia, changes do occur – slower than in other countries.

  16. chukri March 7, 2016 at 7:32 pm #

    Gender equality is a possibility as long as people believe in it.

  17. Celine Yazbeck March 8, 2016 at 5:11 am #

    Happy international women’s day to Red Lips High Heels and all women authors! Keep on raising your voices!

  18. Hayat March 8, 2016 at 5:13 am #

    Good morning. My name is Hayat and I am Moroccan. I love this blog.

    Bravo les dames pour ce travail exceptionnel.
    Et meilleurs voeux pour l’avancement des droits des femmes ici et ailleurs.

    • Dr. Pamela Chrabieh March 8, 2016 at 5:14 am #

      Bonjour Hayat! Merci pour votre commentaire et votre support. Meilleurs voeux à vous aussi!

  19. Leila Fawaz March 8, 2016 at 5:32 pm #

    May this day and this year be a blessing for all women.

Leave a Reply